Article 163 - Family Code and Case: Baluyut et.al. Vs. Baluyut, G.R. No. L-33659

 Article 163

          The filiation of children may be by nature or by adoption. Natural filiation may be legitimate or illegitimate.

  

VICTORIA U. BALUYUT, MA. THERESA U. BALUYUT and MA. FLORDELIZA U. BALUYUT, all minors, represented by their mother and guardian ad litem, NORMA URBANO vs. FELICEDAD S. BALUYUT and HON. COURT OF APPEALS

G.R. No. L-33659 June 14, 1990

Facts:

          This is a petition for certiorari filed by Victoria, Ma. Theresa and Ma. Flordeliza, all surnamed Baluyut, then minors, represented by their mother and guardian ad litem, Norma Urbano, which seeks the reversal of the decision of the Court of Appeals in CA?G.R. No. 38069-R entitled "Felicidad S. Baluyut, Administratrix-Appellant v. Victoria U. Baluyut, et al., Intervenors-Appellees." The decision brought to this court for review reversed the decision of the Court of First Instance of Pampanga (now Regional Trial Court) and dismissed the petition for intervention filed by petitioners in the trial court.

          In Special Proceedings No. 1835, entitled "Intestate Estate of Deceased Enrique Baluyut," filed before the Court of First Instance of Pampanga, herein petitioners filed on April 29, 1965 a petition for intervention.  The petition... alleged that petitioners have a legal interest in the estate of the deceased Enrique M. Baluyut; that petitioners-minors are the illegitimate children of the deceased, begotten out of wedlock by said deceased and petitioners' mother and guardian ad litem Norma Urbano; that petitioners were conceived and born at the time when Norma Urbano cohabited with the deceased while the latter was already married to Felicidad S. Baluyut; that they... were in continuous possession and enjoyment of the status of children of the deceased during his lifetime by direct overt acts of said deceased having supported and maintained them.  The petitioners also alleged that they were deliberately excluded from the... estate of Enrique M. Baluyut (pp. 10-18, Record on Appeal).

          Felicidad S. Baluyut, widow of Enrique and appointed administratrix of his estate, opposed the petition for intervention (p. 20, Record on Appeal).  On May 8, 1965 (pp. 18-19, Record on Appeal), the trial court issued an order allowing the petitioners to intervene.

Felicidad S. Baluyut, widow of Enrique and appointed administratrix of his estate, opposed the petition for intervention (p. 20, Record on Appeal).  On May 8, 1965 (pp. 18-19, Record on Appeal), the trial court issued an order allowing the petitioners to intervene.

          After trial, a decision (pp. 24-31, Record on Appeal) was rendered declaring the intervenors Victoria, Ma. Theresa and Ma. Flordeliza the forced heirs of deceased Enrique Baluyut and ordering administratrix Felicidad Vda. de Baluyut to pay P150.00 monthly support to Norma Urbano, guardian ad litem for the three minor children. The administratrix filed a Notice of Appeal from the trial court's decision.  On February 22, 1966, the intervenors filed their Objection to Appeal and Motion for Execution.  The latter motion... was based on the pronouncement in Salazar v. Salazar, L-5823, April 29, 1953, that an order granting support pendente lite is final and executory.

          On May 4, 1966, the trial court issued an order (p. 37, Record on Appeal) declaring that it considers intervenors' motion for execution as a motion for reconsideration and amended the decision to the effect that it granted the minors Victoria, Theresa and Flordeliza monthly support pendente lite in the amount of P150.00 payable every first day of the month to their guardian ad litem Norma Urbano.

On April 22, 1971, the Court of Appeals rendered judgment (pp. 19-41, Rollo) reversing the decision of the trial court.

Petitioners' motion for reconsideration of respondent Court of Appeals' decision was denied

          The withdrawal of intervention in consideration of the financial assistance extended to petitioners by the administratrix of the estate of the deceased Enrique M. Baluyut (p. 37, Rollo) is in the nature of a... compromise settlement of the instant petition... the Joint Motion to Dismiss the instant petition cannot be granted, acknowledgment, affecting as it does the civil status of persons and of future support cannot be the subject of a compromise

Issues:

Whether or not petitioners, Victoria, Ma. Theresa and Ma. Flordeliza, all surnamed Baluyut are the acknowledged, spurious children of the deceased, Enrique M. Baluyut.

Held:

          The trial court found that petitioners are the illegitimate children of the deceased Enrique M. Baluyut.  This finding was shared by respondent Court of Appeals:

          However, proof of filiation of the petitioners to the late Enrique M. Baluyut is not sufficient to confer upon them any hereditary right in the estate of the deceased.  What is necessary to be established by an illegitimate not... natural child in order that he may be entitled to successional rights under Article 887 of the New Civil Code, is not the fact of his bare filiation but a filiation acknowledged by the putative parent.

Paulino v. Paulino, 113 Phil. 697, 700, 701,702.  In the Paulino case, it was held:

          "An illegitimate (spurious) child to be entitled to support and successional rights from his putative or presumed parents must prove his filiation to them.  Filiation may be established by the voluntary or... compulsory recognition of the illegitimate (spurious) child.  Recognition is voluntary when "made in the record of birth, a will, a statement before a court of record, or in any authentic writing." It is compulsory when by court action the child brings about... his recognition.

          There are two modes of acknowledgment provided in the New Civil Code:  one, by the voluntary recognition by the putative parent made in the record of birth, a statement before the court of record, or in any authentic writing (Art. 278, New Civil Code) and... two, by compulsory recognition under Article 283 of the same law.

          There is no evidence as required by Article 278 which proves that the petitioners were recognized by the deceased during his lifetime as his spurious children.  The petitioners' records of birth, although in the name of Enrique Baluyut, were not... signed by the latter.  There was no authentic writing presented nor any statement in a court of record which would prove that the petitioners were recognized by the deceased.

With regard to compulsory recognition, Article 283 enumerates the cases where the father is obliged to recognize the child as his, namely:  a) in cases of rape, abduction of seduction, when the period of the offense coincides more... or less with that of the conception; b) when the child is in continuous possession of the status of a child of the alleged father by the direct acts of the latter or his family; c) when the child was conceived during the time when the mother cohabited with the supposed father;... d) when the child has in his favor any evidence or proof that the defendant is his father.

          The grounds relied upon by petitioners for compelling the heirs of Baluyut to recognize them as the heirs of the deceased were the alleged possession by the petitioners of the status of recognized illegitimate spurious children and that they were conceived at the... time when their mother cohabited with the deceased.

          We agree with respondent appellate court that the evidence presented by petitioners failed to satisfy the high standard of proof required for the success of their action for compulsory recognition.

          'In order to prove the continuous possession of the status of a natural child, the acts must be of such a nature that they reveal, not only the conviction of paternity, but also the apparent desire to have and treat the child as such in all relations in society and in life, not accidentally, but continuously’.

          "The birth certificates Exhibits 'A,' 'B' and 'C' of the intervenors do not help their case for these are not evidence of recognized filiation by the deceased Enrique Baluyut because, firstly, they were admitted in evidence by... the lower court merely as part of the testimony of the witnesses who referred to them in the course of said witnesses' testimony and hence, they are not evidence of the facts stated in them.  Secondly, they are merely evidence of the fact that gave... rise to their execution, that is, the fact of birth and nothing else, much less of recognition as they are not signed by Enrique Baluyut.

          'In an action for compulsory acknowledgment under paragraph 4, Article 283 of the Civil Code, a birth certificate which, on its face, was not signed by the supposed natural father is incompetent evidence on paternity, being in violation of section 5... of Act 3753 and Article 280 of the Civil Code’

          "Upon the second point, whether a voluntary acknowledgment may be done incidentally in a public document, a distinction must be made between the two kinds of acknowledgment: (1) voluntary, and (2) compulsory.  In the... former, recognition may be incidental, but in the latter, it must be direct and express.

          "In actions to compel the alleged father to acknowledge his natural child, based upon recognition in an indubitable writing, article 135, par. 1, of the Civil Code, requires that the father must 'expressly recognize his paternity.' This provision has... been strictly construed by Spanish and Philippine jurisprudence against the alleged natural child.

ACCORDINGLY, the decision appealed from is AFFIRMED.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Article 91 - Family Code and Case: Nobleza Vs. Nuega, G.R. No. 193038

Article 20 Case Digest: Sps. Quisumbing Vs. Meralco

Article 39, Case Digest - Family Code: Wiegel vs. Judge Sempio-Diy